If you’re offering any products or services involving a negative option or automatic renewal plan, pay close attention to the FTC’s announcement today of a proposed rule that would drastically alter requirements for negative option disclosures while simultaneously granting the agency authority to seek redress and civil penalties for misrepresentations unrelated to the negative option transaction itself, such as claims related to underlying products, features, and services. Among other things, the rule as proposed would require cancellation be “at least as easy to use as the method the consumer used to initiate the Negative Option Feature,” obtain consent before trying to “save” a cancellation attempt, and provide annual reminders for services that do not involve the physical delivery of goods.
In her dissent, Commissioner Wilson characterized the proposed rule as an “end-run around the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG” and detailed a host of substantive and procedural issues with the proposed rule.
Further analysis and our take below.